<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curious coincedence, the definition of &#8220;Tetrical&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/</link>
	<description>Games ex Machina</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Steve, I have seen the top down 3D Tetris variant.  Personally, I prefer the side view.  Yes, if you build too much in the front of your stack, you can get into trouble with the view.  But, I feel that it&#039;s part of the challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I have seen the top down 3D Tetris variant.  Personally, I prefer the side view.  Yes, if you build too much in the front of your stack, you can get into trouble with the view.  But, I feel that it&#8217;s part of the challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Randy, I&#039;ve seen comments before about key presses being ignored which I haven&#039;t been able to duplicate.  Thanks for providing the details that you think it has to do with the rotate view function.  I&#039;ll look into that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy, I&#8217;ve seen comments before about key presses being ignored which I haven&#8217;t been able to duplicate.  Thanks for providing the details that you think it has to do with the rotate view function.  I&#8217;ll look into that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I really like it.

However, I think there is a bug. I occasionally have trouble getting the blocks to rotate. The keys presses don&#039;t elicit a response from the game. Seems to occur right after I rotate the view.

Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like it.</p>
<p>However, I think there is a bug. I occasionally have trouble getting the blocks to rotate. The keys presses don&#8217;t elicit a response from the game. Seems to occur right after I rotate the view.</p>
<p>Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalmachina.com/archives/2007/12/13/curious-coincedence-the-definition-of-tetrical/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Jeff,
A nice piece of work. Interestingly, another 3D variant of Tetris that has been around for about 20 years is called &quot;BlockOut,&quot; back in the days of DOS. An updated version called &quot;BlockOut II&quot; is available at http://www.blockout.net/blockout2/
You might want to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,<br />
A nice piece of work. Interestingly, another 3D variant of Tetris that has been around for about 20 years is called &#8220;BlockOut,&#8221; back in the days of DOS. An updated version called &#8220;BlockOut II&#8221; is available at <a href="http://www.blockout.net/blockout2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blockout.net/blockout2/</a><br />
You might want to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
